How To Tell A Steep Tech Is Fake

Archangel 04-11 RENDERING: VIEW

.

Sometimes the question of the Freeway Piazzo back in fashion, a sort of mirror (election) for larks.

The work is obviously needed and heralded utilities regardless , no cost-benefit analysis (which will also damage the environment and landscape) is drawn up, no serious discussion.

The idea of \u200b\u200btangential Piazzo was born together with the estimates of the PEC small drum, which has always been the cornerstone of . To take off this costly and risky investment property (formerly Bertrand failure) is a road and a "policy" that provides in that direction.

This is not news that the public works often serves as a basic flying to other jobs. Even in the bypass Occhieppo Superior (public) has solved the same heavy burden to carry primary infrastructure works at a major PEC (private) provided in the town center.

obviously always concerned accidental coincidences between the larks the argument holds and it is widespread.

Unfortunately in the case of the bypass of the contradictions Piazzo never fail: Mello Rella Gabriele recently illustrated the need to resolve conflicts between Plan and the Geological Survey. The Plan acknowledges the fact in some areas but that possibility to build is not recommended by the Geological Survey, written later.

Well, but for this you do not understand why the public should try to build a road in an area that we know everything about the geological instability (Class II, III and IIIa), where construction is simply an expensive venture and where there is also a constraint landscape.

That we will Biella-jannacciani want to see the effect that makes , as Graglia, and let fun build expensive works in areas classified as high risk? Nothing surprising.

The history of the bypass of the square has seen the Gian Luca beat his time to his nose in front of the technical evidence (the officials of the region could never agree on the variation of PRGC prepared for this' work, too high then the risk of having to answer before the Court of Accounts), but a good politician turned the debacle in agreement to form a new majority with the PDS.

Then a fierce bunch of green / environmental association / livable the city (and visible, he was not sure below) had the habit of dissecting the merits (see material ) actually putting a spoke in the wheels.

Today the matter is left to the securities only few passengers press release, written with no content or design, personal visibility in search of one.

In a City Council tacky when it is not clear whether it is more arraffazzonata the majority (too few chairs for too many suitors) or opposition (without ideas and without heart) can obviously happen all to the benefit of overbuilding and the unnecessary increase in public spending.

We will then arrange everything, including the viaducts, with a touch of urban , two colored lights, a bit 'here and a little' there ....
.